Arizona Conservative Coalition Republican
Legislator Rankings
Legislative Actions
as of 5/17/2013
Last Updated 5/21/2013
Narrative:
The number of bills being tracked is 265 plus 3 Strike All amended bills.
Ten Senate budget bills were just added to the evaluation. These bills have all
gotten negative weights because they unnecessarily increase spending. In
addition, some of the budget bills are expanding Medicaid and funding Common
Core in K-12 education which we strongly oppose.
Here is what happened in the past week with bills that are part of the
evaluation:
In the House:
HB2045, which gives discretion to the executive branch on Medicaid
payment amounts to hospitals and was amended in the conference committee to
also include Medical Procedure price posting regulations, passed the House in a
final read. This bill, which we strongly oppose, allows executive discretion
instead of rules set by the legislature which is an abrogation of the
legislature’s role and permits executive discretion which invites corrupting
government processes by allowing favoritism. Also, the Medical Procedure price
posting regulations are a useless burden placed on medical service providers
which provide no real benefit for patients as the bill is written.
In the Senate:
HB2045, which is described above, passed the Senate in a final read.
SB1483-SB1492, which are budget bills, all passed the Senate. We
opposed these budget bills because they increase spending unnecessarily. Three
of them are particularly bad because of funding for Medicaid Expansion, Common
Core K-12 Education, and egregious pork barrel spending. The Senate majority
that passed these budget bills included the Democrats and liberal “Republicans”
who joined forces at the urging of the governor to pass a bloated budget that
she and the Democrats wanted. It brings back unpleasant memories of Janet
Napolitano. With enough outcry from Republican voters, perhaps this budget can
be fixed in the House. With 24 Democrat votes in the House, only 7 “Republicans”
are needed to get this budget passed in the House. With enough phone calls and
emails to House members, it might be possible to stop this in the House,
especially if the Republican leaders are not pressuring Republicans to vote for
it.
We have added a new feature to the ratings. There is now a section
showing scoring exceptions for a legislator voting NO on a bill in order to
make a motion to reconsider it. This is explained in the score section in more
detail. The basic idea is that, in this special case, a NO vote is counted as a
YES vote in the evaluation because the legislator is actually advancing the
bill by using the NO vote as a parliamentary tactic to be permitted to give the
bill another chance to be voted on.
As we near the end of the session, we remind legislators as well as the
voters to beware of omnibus bills and last minute amendments that can contain
legislative language that might be glossed over to sneak it past legislators. This
is often done by overwhelming legislators with too many pages of legislation to
read before voting or by making last minute changes that are difficult to
properly evaluate before a vote. Legislators should understand that any bill
containing legislative language from a bill that we gave a negative weight may
get the negative weight of that negatively weighted bill regardless of how many
good things are also in the revised bill currently being voted on. Since it
will be impossible for the contents of omnibus bills or bills with last minute
amendments to be known early enough for an announcement about how the bill
weights will be reset for the evaluation, everyone needs to be aware that they
will be evaluated on the final version of the bills they vote on after the
votes take place. With the Governor digging in to pressure the legislature to
expand Medicaid, we will be watching for that in late breaking bills as well as
appropriation omnibus bills. We will also be looking for Common Core funding in
omnibus bills. We strongly oppose both and will weight bills that include them
accordingly.
These are NOT final scores for the session until our final report after
the session ends! We encourage conservative activists to use these weekly
evaluations as a way to work with legislators to achieve more conservative
results in the legislative session.
Bills having a significant negative impact on scores remove significant
limitations on school district spending, allow executive agencies to set fees
in order to bypass limitations on the legislature raising taxes or fees, or
increase government regulation of businesses.
Many Republican
legislators have argued that good business regulations that “make people do the
right thing” are good. This, unfortunately, is almost a perfect definition of
fascism which Republicans traditionally oppose. There are always situations
where we might wish others would deal with us on terms of our choosing when
they are not willing to do so. Using government to force people to deal with us
on our terms rather than mutually agreed upon terms is tyranny even if it is
dressed up as consumer protection or professional responsibility or trying to
improve market efficiency. Of course, in a free economy, people can decide for
themselves what is good and make decisions on that basis as both consumers and
businesses. Also, government regulations usually have unintended consequences
that are usually bad. These consequences are then used to justify still more
regulation when less regulation is the best solution.
0 comments:
Post a Comment